The Indian Archaeological Survey (ASI), a “neutral and secular means of the central government,” said it was best suited to tell the truth about conflict cases and investigations. The Ministry of Culture may continue to support not only the Hindus, but also the Muslims, regardless of the findings, if the version is really true.
Cases are listed on May 31 for further orders.
The court requested the Director of ASI (DG) to establish a five-member committee of archaeological experts. The “observer” should also be appointed by the archaeological expert DG, who said the Commission would report on the research work carried out as such.
“The main purpose of archaeological research is whether the religious structure currently standing in the disputed place is a superposition, modification, or addition, or any kind of structure with or beyond other religions. It’s about checking for duplicates. Structure, “the court said in an order Thursday. “If so, what exactly is the age, size, monumental and architectural design or style of the religious building currently standing in the conflict area, and what materials are used to build it. is it being done.”
The court further said, “The Commission shall also track whether temples belonging to the Hindu community existed before the mosque in question was built, overlaid, or added in the conflict area. So what exactly is the age, size, monumental and architectural design or style of the same thing, and also to which gods the same Hindu gods were dedicated to. ”
Also, during the investigation work, Muslims who come to the conflict area to provide catfish should not be prevented from doing so, and if the work does not promote activity, the Commission will substitute them in the precincts. Of the Gyanvapi Masji who said that a place should be given.
The courts are particularly aware of “problem sensitivity” and therefore to ensure that stakeholders in cases belonging to both religions are equally respected and that no one is treated in a “partisan or priority” manner. Asked for a committee so formed.
The investigation should be conducted in a “disguised” manner, with no access to the general public or the media, the Commission never being briefed by the Commission on progress, and the Commission on either party. He said he had the right to security so that it could not be tampered with. Work and ensure that the district administration maintains the peace and tranquility of the region.
The petition was filed in 2019 by a local lawyer, Vijay Shankar Rastogi. He claimed that the temple of Sir Swayambhun Vishweshwar, one of the twelve Jyotirlinga, had been in conflict since ancient times and was rebuilt by Raja Vikramaditya 2,050 years ago. It was ordered to be demolished by Aurangzeb in 1669. Linga remains in the mosque, and believers have worshiped it since ancient times, but cannot “provide Jar” to Linga. Anjuman Intejamiya Masjid (the mosque’s governing board) and the Sunni Central Waqf Commission opposed the plea.
Meanwhile, a separate case has been heard by the High Court on the Muslim side stating that the Worship Law applies to disputed places, such as August 15, 1947, prohibiting changes to the place of worship. The High Court, which will issue an order next month, will rule in favor of the Muslims, invalidating the current order on the investigation. However, defender Vishnu Jain, who filed another proceeding to free the Kashi Vishwanath Temple, said the Hindus would challenge the unfavorable order of the Supreme Court’s High Court.
Varanasi Court Orders ASI Investigation into Kasivishwanat Temple-Gyanvapi Masji Conflict
Source link Varanasi Court Orders ASI Investigation into Kasivishwanat Temple-Gyanvapi Masji Conflict