Seattle: Two years ago, after the second fatal 737 MAX crash in five months, Boeing worked behind the scenes to urge airline regulators not to touch the jets.
The effort extended to the White House, and Boeing’s then CEO Dennis Muilenburg called former US President Donald Trump to ensure that the jets were safe.
However, a United Airlines 777 engine broke down on Saturday, causing unpleasant footage of the engine burning and lumps of metal scattered outside Denver, with no injuries.
Within a day, Boeing issued a statement calling on airlines to stop using 777 jets with the same Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engine, effectively grounding 128 jets when the investigation was conducted. did.
The world’s largest aerospace company also expressed clear support for the Federal Aviation Administration’s request for additional inspections and Japan’s forced suspension of flight.
“If Boeing has learned from the situation at MAX, it’s time to take action,” said one industry source familiar with Boeing’s ideas. “Even if that action can cause some loss or embarrassment, do it quickly.”
Boeing’s response to engine failures on Saturday reflects the brand and image challenges the company faces in rebuilding its core commercial jet program and corporate finances.
Incidents related to United 777 are the epicenter of Boeing’s frayed regulatory and political affairs, and aviation accidents occur in the very rare market of the United States, and if they do occur, they are of great interest.
In a dramatic incident on Saturday and another incident in the Netherlands on the same day, another PW4000 engine exploded on a 747, causing a storm on social media. There, in a widely shared video, a jet engine burned in the air and a huge engine blade was wedged. On the roof of a car.
Investigators are looking at engines designed and manufactured by Raytheon Technologies’ Pratt & Whitney units, not Boeing.
Still, as media coverage of the Denver case broke on Saturday, Boeing officials told the FAA that they supported the recommendation for additional testing, a second source said. It was hours before Boeing announced public comment, even though effective grounding would affect other customers flying with the PW4000 engine.
“They are trying to rebuild, collaborate and take ownership,” said Paul Argentina, a professor at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business. “Their reputation is the most valuable asset they have, and transparency is needed to build trust.”
A Boeing spokesman declined to comment.
The incident followed the failure of other aerial engines related to Pratt & Whitney’s PW4000, and recently in December, the failure caused the JAL777 to Tokyo to suddenly return to Naha Airport.
A Pratt & Whitney spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company said it is coordinating with regulators to review inspection protocols.
The weekend incident involved two aging aircraft and took place in the midst of a pandemic that reduced demand for the largest jets Boeing produces. According to analysts, the potential economic impact of Boeing grounding an old plane is relatively small.
In contrast, the MAX crisis occurred when the demand for air travel surged, with design issues for Boeing’s best-selling jets.
Grounding the 737 MAX for nearly two years cost Boeing about $ 20 billion, causing criminal and congressional investigations, hundreds of proceedings, and the expulsion of executives, including Murenberg.
As CEO, Marenberg apologized to the victim’s family and made changes to the board and Boeing engineering to improve safety surveillance. He has refused to comment on the company since he left his post in late 2019.
Industry experts warned that it was too early to determine Boeing’s response and how the MAX crisis changed its culture.
“The stakes are much lower,” said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst at Thiel Group. “They may have learned a lesson from the MAX crisis, but this is not the situation to show it.”
Disclaimer: This post is auto-published from the agency feed without modification of the text and has not been reviewed by the editor.
Boeing changes course with quick response to engine punctures
Source link Boeing changes course with quick response to engine punctures